Initial Width of Fancy Background
Hi Ive been searching for a means to adjust the initial width of the fancy menu background element. On page refresh the width is different from the size if you rollover the menu and left the fancy background settle back on the same menu element.
So far Ive been trying to achieve width correction by adjusting:
div.maximenuckh li.maxiFancybackground {
margin-right:30px!important;
}
Using screengrab to compare effects it doesnt seem to be working I think.
Its hard to use firebug in these tests as the moment the cursor moves over the menu the fancybackground width is corrected to the right width.
Note: Im presently not using the responsive version of maximenuck just becuase Im not familiar with this at present.
K
So far Ive been trying to achieve width correction by adjusting:
div.maximenuckh li.maxiFancybackground {
margin-right:30px!important;
}
Using screengrab to compare effects it doesnt seem to be working I think.
Its hard to use firebug in these tests as the moment the cursor moves over the menu the fancybackground width is corrected to the right width.
Note: Im presently not using the responsive version of maximenuck just becuase Im not familiar with this at present.
K
by k8fisher
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
the width is calculated in javascript, so you won't be able to manage this in css.
Look at the padding and margin on your elements, this may cause an issue, but just strange that it only occurs on page load
Ced
Look at the padding and margin on your elements, this may cause an issue, but just strange that it only occurs on page load
Ced
Joomlack Webmaster and Developer
by ced1870
The following user(s) said Thank You: k8fisher
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Many thanks will recheck everything, certainly not seen it act like this before *shakes pesky finger at myself* for introducing this to the funkyness that is maximenuck.
K
K
by k8fisher
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Have found the issue, or rather avoided it by rolling back to original versions of code.
by k8fisher
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.991 seconds