Images Size (and maybe Bootstrap?)

I had also tried max-width: none, which also seemed to work.

I guess the question is -- can you think of any reason why we'd need to keep that max-width operational?

I can see that the table wouldn't be responsive, though I can't think of any other way to keep the text from poking in between the pictures. I've tried having big margins at the bottom of each image, but that seems to just make a mess.

But I don't know why being in a table would make the images shrink on a large screen, nor why it only started happening today.

Thanks,
Matt

yes for the responsive. the max-width force the image to not be more that the container
The table are specific because they have no real width, they take the width of the content, here the image but it has the max-width ... you see the problem ?

what you can do is to leave the max-width and add this rule

table img {
max-width: none;
}

Thanks, Ced. Tried that, looks fine in Safari and FF, but still the same tiny pics in Chrome. This is so peculiar.

clear your cache, by my side this is ok now on chrome

Ok, thanks. I was using one of the browser images sites that lets you see your site in multiple browsers. I don't, and won't, have Chrome on my machine, but I'll check with some other people.

Thanks, as always, for your time, Ced. I don't know how you do it.

Matt

ok

Thanks, as always, for your time, Ced. I don't know how you do it.

don't ask me, I don't know